Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am by Charon QC
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am by Rosalind English
Judgment in Jude and others v HM Advocate  The Court accepted the Lord Advocate’s position that  the appeals on the issue as to  waiver in regard to the police interviews of Jude and Hodgson should be dismissed. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am by INFORRM
  The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
And in the week when Lord Geidt resigned as Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Lord Sumption has stated "I think that [the guidance] should be re-examined by the Patents Court and the Court of Appeal", so how might this practice vary if Lord Sumption's comments are acted upon, and how might a different policy on stays affect litigation in practice? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
Despite Ms Berrisford’s success on the first point, Lord Neuberger went on to consider her alternative case in contract (the licence argument pursued before the Court of Appeal) and stated he “incline[d] fairly strongly to the view” that such an argument would have been successful insofar as it applied to the original contracting parties. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Sumption. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
Lord Neuberger MR recently gave a speech to the RICS conference on dilapidations. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
Lord Neuberger MR recently gave a speech to the RICS conference on dilapidations. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
The court considered the application of the principle of ‘purposive construction’, derived originally from the words of Lord Diplock in the UK case of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183. [read post]