Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
The crux of the particular case, Windsor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:21 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:36 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Reddic v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
The Supreme Court recently handed down judgment in Bank of Cyprus UK Limited v Menelaou [2015] UKSC 66, providing valuable clarification concerning the areas of unjust enrichment and subrogation in particular. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
(Scott v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Fla. 1988); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court today granted a writ of certiorari in Arizona et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:24 pm
(Europe) Ltd v Inter-Zuid Transport BV (case C452/12). [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:41 am
One of the main reasons for this was because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
United States of America v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
The main assumption behind these proposals is a premise that undergirds my field and, indeed, most arguments for reform: process shapes substance. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Since this warrant failed to satisfy that standard, the Queens County Supreme Court granted the defendants’ suppression and dismissal request.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, also had some issues with the underlying paperwork, which described the “Subject Location,” as “`a two-story, two-family home,’ with a ‘right main entrance’ and a ‘left main entrance,’ in which ‘[t]he right entrance opens up to a… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
Charles Coble at the Newsroom Law Blog comments on the United States Supreme Court's decision to deny certiorari in Salzano v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff In a decision on August 15, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) reversed and remanded the district court’s decision in Visual Memory LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
The main issues in the case, Tanenblatt v. [read post]
