Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
On Thursday I thought Munich, where Qualcomm just lost a case against Apple (and, by extension, Intel), was going to be the venue where the cellular chipset maker would file its first appeal in a litigation between private parties that is part of the current globe-spanning host of lawsuits. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Summerlin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 6:19 am
Co. in Salem v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
The Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I" in German) just announced the first final judgment on a Qualcomm v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:48 am
Covington represented Samsung in this case (White, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
" And then they quote from a decision the District Court of Massachusetts made in August 2016 in Esoterix v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:21 am
First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:24 am
Smartphone Purchasers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:41 am
Fowler v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
La procédure orale devant la chambre de recours a eu lieu le 13 juin 2018.V. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:36 pm
See State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:35 am
The fact that the decision-maker sought to rescind the white candidate’s promotion when the employee filed a grievance over the decision was not suggestive of pretext, the appeals court said; rather, it showed that the decision-maker took the allegation of discrimination seriously and wanted to ensure that the promotion decision was above-board (Roberson-King v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm
It's a long battle to convince app makers that competition in app stores would result in their being able to keep more of that 30 percent commission they currently pay to Apple. [read post]
