Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am by Robin Shea
Supreme Court agreed to decide this past Monday in the case of Green v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:35 pm by Chip Merlin
In consequence of the Australian miners’ presence, it may have come about as a description of the hastily carried-out proceedings used to deal with the issue of claim-jumping miners. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
The farmer lent a churn to the neighbour who returned it in a damaged state. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  In a transparent attempt to hamstring pharmaceutical marketing, the state of Vermont made it illegal for data miners to sell physician prescribing information to pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:59 pm
The regime complex includes a wide range of regulations and institutions, from the hard law global and regional organizations have adopted (such as the UN, the EU, and the WTO) to soft law initiatives groups of states (such as the OECD’s guidelines on conflict minerals and human rights) and private bodies (such as the codes of conduct adopted by individual corporations or transnational business associations) have undertaken. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]