Search for: "State v. Newman" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
The arguments are before Judges Joseph Lisa, Richard Newman, and Paulette Sapp-Peterson (Panel G). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:13 am
  As stated by the court:  "The foreseeability principle thus relegates the doctrine of equivalents to its appropriate exceptional place in patent enforcement. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Newman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 816 (18 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mills v Birchall & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 385 (18 April 2008) Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 387 (18 April 2008) Morgan v UPS Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 375 (17 April 2008) Strachey v Ramage [2008] EWCA Civ 384 (18 April 2008) Bonham & Anor v Fishwick &… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division decision, please use this link: Matter of Newman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:07 pm
Today Judge Linn authored the dissent again, this time joined by Judges Newman and Rader. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:10 pm
Earlier, in Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Newman (Wake Forest) has posted several tax papers on SSRN: Baseball Autographs, 116 Tax Notes 1078 (2007) CHAMP: How the Tax Court Finessed a Bad Statute, 116 Tax Notes 887 (2007) Gilmore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Newman (Wake Forest) has posted several tax papers on SSRN: Baseball Autographs, 116 Tax Notes 1078 (2007) CHAMP: How the Tax Court Finessed a Bad Statute, 116 Tax Notes 887 (2007) Gilmore v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
Appropriation of funds is discretionary and not ministerial, and mandamus will not lie to compel payment of a judgment by a political subdivision" (The Newman Marchive Partnership, Inc. v City of Shreveport, 962 So2d 1075, 1077 1078 [La 2007], see also Cooper v Orleans Parish School Bd., 742 So2d 55, 64 [La 1999], writ denied 751 So2d 858 [La 1999]). [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:04 am
This bill is in response to the Supreme Court decision in Alcoy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 1983, and for malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, pursuant to Ohio state law. [read post]