Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 36,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Federal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
In the Apprendi line of cases, Scalia consistently sought to contrast Breyer’s vision with what he characterized as the “common-law ideal of limited state power” (to quote his opinion for the majority in Blakely v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:05 am
Vet Voice Foundation v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 7:09 pm
Clarke v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:40 pm
Fund v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The Taxing Power itself is granted in Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which says: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:00 pm
Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday, in the case Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 4:05 pm
As evidenced in the recent case Moore v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
Brown v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Cohen v California, 403 U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:17 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
“At the time,” McGrath wrote, “the State of Montana and its government were operating under a mere shell of legal authority, and the real social and political power was wielded by powerful corporate managers to further their own business interests. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Against the back drop of Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]