Search for: "State v. Simon" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am by Robert Chang
Simon Tam has been using the S-word as his band’s name since 2006. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Phone hacking: Simon Mckay, solicitor advocate, has an interesting post with an alternative angle on the Culture, Media and Sport select committee report, questioning MPs’ condemnation of Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 In her statement to the Commons, the Secretary of State said [with added links]: Protecting children is at the heart of our online harms agenda, and is key to wider Government priorities. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Increased market for digital goods and increased consumer expectation of what they can do with lawfully purchased digital goods.Panelists: Emery Simon, BSA, The Software Alliance The issue for us is not first sale, but licensing. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday,  A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Nathan Dorn
New York: Simon and Schuster, c2001. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The former Secretary of State at DLUHC, Sir Simon Clarke (Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland), tweeted “We have to be able to control our borders. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]