Search for: "State v. So "
Results 1241 - 1260
of 117,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 4:08 pm
Last month, in Dorsey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
If he omits to do so, he will be deemed by his silence to have acquiesced, and will be bound by it as an account stated, unless fraud, mistake or other equitable considerations are shown. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
As stated in the cert. petition, these are the questions presented: (1) Whether after Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:20 am
R (Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2008] UKHL 60; [2008] WLR (D) 267 “Where, following threats by a foreign state as to the consequences, affecting national security, if he pursued an investigation into alleged corruption, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office had discontinued it, he had been entitled in his discretion to do so. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:56 am
Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de L’emploi (ONEm) (Case C-34/09); [2011] WLR (D) 81 ”A third country national with dependent children who were European citizens, had, pursuant to article 20FEU of the FEU Treaty, a right of residence in the member state of residence and nationality of those children and was entitled to a work permit in so far as this enabled the children to enjoy the substance of the rights attaching to the status of European Union… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 6:40 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544, 565 (1981). [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:11 am
These issues were decided recently at least for the state of Massachusetts in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:05 am
In Lesterhuis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:49 am
Q: So you've finally gone with the blogosphere herd and resorted to the FAQ style for this post. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:50 am
Miguel v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2011] UKPC 14; [2011] WLR (D) 198 “A constitutional provision which exempted both existing laws and enactments which altered existing laws from its protection did not extend to an enactment which altered a law that had existed before the Constitution came into force but had since been abolished. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 9:32 am
The post Court Denies TRO Seeking to Remove Facebook’s “Russia State-Controlled Media” Label–Maffick v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:33 am
See Kenna v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In Perrier-Bilbo v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
State v. [read post]
