Search for: "State v. South"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 11,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
Cox v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has indicated its intent to sue four states – Arizona, Utah, South Dakota, and South Carolina – because each has adopted a constitutional provision that guarantees a secret ballot for establishment of a collective bargaining unit. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled that it could not hear the appeal of American Isuzu Motors v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
We attempted to file an amicus brief in Doe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:20 am
Indeed, the facts of a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pettit v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:03 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 7:49 am
After all, conservatives also love to hate Miranda v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Following a January 2023 decision rejecting a 6-week statutory ban as violating the state’s constitution, a reconstituted South Carolina Supreme Court found the ban constitutional in August 2023. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
The ambiguity here is from an extradition treaty with South Korea that says that if the statute of limitations in the receiving party for the crime has already expired, that party "may" refuse to extradite the requested person.So imagine, as here, that South Korea asks the U.S. to extradite someone for second degree murder, but the statute of limitations for this crime here -- five years -- has already expired. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
South Carolina Clean Air Initiative, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
He also stated that the general rule that there is no duty to protect others from third party harm is not appropriate for members of a force whose duty it is to provide protection. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
To be sure, some of the States that deny the merits of South Africa’s case have their own good names to worry about, given the potential fallout from the lawsuit. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
[www.angel-diaz.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Sudan has been a failed state for quarter of a century of civil war and there is no guarantee that the new seceded South Sudan will be immune from the same fate. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:43 am
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:06 pm
This would not be the first K-9 case in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
