Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am by INFORRM
There should be “no unnecessary barriers” to the use of justification (McDonald’s Corp v Steel [1995] 3 All ER 615), and a defendant should be able to enjoy “a full opportunity to make good whatever defence he has” (Basham v Gregory (unreported, 21 February 1996 CA) per Lord Bingham MR). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:52 am by Christopher G. Hill
In a second case, Steel Erectors Ass’n of America v OSHA (.pdf ), the petitioner, SEAA, challenged a 2010 directive from OSHA regarding the enforcement of 2001 safety standards regarding steel construction, claiming that the enforcement change was an illegal regulation. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Beck previews the argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:06 am by Matt C. Bailey
Significantly, the Court reasoned that defendants’ arguments sought to lure the Court to deny certification on grounds divorced from the plaintiff’s theory of liability – analysis the Ninth Circuit recently deemed to constitute an abuse of discretion:This analysis also gibes with another recent appellate decision, United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Cochrane Steel owns various trade marks including CLEAR VU.November: It was a cut-and-dried case of trade infringement and passing-off in Hendler & Hart (Pty) Ltd v BV Cookware (Pty) Ltd where the defendant was found to be selling kitchenware products in packaging bearing a mark closely resembling the applicant’s HART trade marks.In December, the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa directed the respondent in Dart Industries Incorporated and another v Botle… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Among the bloggers, John Steele has done the best job of raising the substantive issues; so have a few comment contributors in the other blogs. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States Steel Corp., in which the Court is considering what constitutes “changing clothes” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
But that is where we are with GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA, set for argument next Tuesday. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am by Adrian Miedema
Resource Development Trades Council of Newfoundland and Labrador v Long Harbour Employers Association Inc, 2013 CanLII 88826 (NL LA)   [read post]