Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 6:40 am
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:11 pm
Right: an unusual defence strategy, but it might just work ...The May 2010 issue of the European Trade Mark Reports (ETMR), published monthly by Sweet & Maxwell, contains some choice cases. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:01 pm
Last v Guardian Life Ins. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
; R. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:33 am
Karst – Last Friday, several days after FDA held a meeting on the public’s assessment of the overall performance of the fourth iteration of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), which was reauthorized as Title I of the 2007 FDA Amendments Act (“FDAAA”), and what aspects of the program should be retained, changed, or discontinued in the next iteration of the program – PDUFA V – when it comes up for reauthorization (PDUFA… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:12 am
Diamond v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
See Madey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:14 am
Antonious v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:11 pm
As you may know, I’m already worked up over the inane 152-page ruling by Judge Sweet in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:26 am
The FAA also notoriously granted immunity to the telecom companies that participated in that spying, which prevents judicial review of whether the telecoms acted illegally (hence the recent dismissal of Hepting v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
By way of example, I hope to do a new edition of my Law of Independent Legal Advice (Carswell, 2000) to take into account some of the more recent law, including, for example, Miglin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
§ 31342(a); Sweet Pea Marine, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
” Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times recalled the Justice’s Chicago connections, as did William Mullen of the Chicago Tribune. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
The current (April 2010) issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports (click here for details) carries reports on various important recent trade mark cases, the first of which is an English translation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal of 's Hertengebosch in Revillon Chocolatier v Trianon Chocolatiers BV. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Selectica, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
You can read it for yourself here.The IPKat's friend Colin Birss QC has drawn his attention to a landmark ruling in an American case about patenting genes: AMP v USPTO 09 Civ 4515 (DJ Sweet). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:31 pm
She’s sweet and pretty but shallow and vapid. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
This opinion's rationale, if adopted elsewhere, has the potential to convert untasty sweets into causes of action to be wielded against unsuspecting candy manufacturers.The case at issue is Arthur Slugworth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:30 am
In State v. [read post]
