Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1241 - 1260 of 4,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
It will be interesting to see whether the case will end up in the Texas Supreme Court, which last year passed on an opportunity to weigh in on this issue. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
” [11]Lastly, the court supports the FCC’s determination that mobile broadband does not qualify as a functional equivalent to mobile voice even though consumers use a single handset and wireless network to access both services. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
” [11]Lastly, the court supports the FCC’s determination that mobile broadband does not qualify as a functional equivalent to mobile voice even though consumers use a single handset and wireless network to access both services. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court as the justices weigh whether to hear arguments against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency whose independent, single-director design long has drawn the ire of the financial industry and congressional Republicans. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:11 am by Andrew Keane Woods
Before the travel ban cases, but especially after them, federal courts scholars have been focused on—consumed by? [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Today: surveillance capitalism, dark patterns/manipulating consumer demand. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
The private sector has become the biggest repository of consumers’ private data with little or no reaction by the people concerned. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
Worse, as anti-threat vendors do a poorer job of their core consumer protection function, consumers’ trust in the entire anti-threat industry will degrade even more. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to give the president more control over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the agency that regulates mortgages and credit cards,” “[a]sking the court to take up a pending appeal” and to rule that “the Constitution requires that the president be allowed to fire the agency’s director for any reason. [read post]