Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 21,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
But since a reasonable officer could disagree on this, plaintiff has no case. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
He is a "tester," someone who tests places of public accommodation to see if they are ADA-compliant. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:32 am
The Third Circuit applied that test here, with a focus on the element of control to conclude that Plaintiff was not an "employee" and the District Court properly dismissed his case. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:40 pm
The federal district court was acting within its authority as “gatekeeper” for precluding the plaintiff’s causation expert in the trial involving a fatal car crash. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 7:39 am
None of the factors for consideration under either the Panduit test or the two-supplier market test includes contemplation of subjective buying decisions by market participants, which is the information Defendants’ subpoena seeks to elicit. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
"[Plaintiff] asks this Court to set aside the judgment based on the newly discovered evidence that [defendant's expert] lied about his qualifications and about performing tests. . . . [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
The court added:Defendants were clearly harassing Duffin about his religion, and trying to test his adherence to his beliefs – especially when they invited him to a night club and sent women to his hotel room to proposition him for sex. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 4:15 am
The court rejected plaintiffs' free exercise challenge, finding that the law is neutral and generally applicable, and rejected plaintiffs' overbreadth challenge as well. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 5:30 pm
Test Masters Educ. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:54 pm
Conservation of limited financial resources meets that test. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:05 am
Applying the Supreme Court's test articulated in Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:05 am
Applying the balancing test in the Supreme Court's Pickering decision, the court concluded that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to the extent of the disruption that the blog posts caused within the Fire Department. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
The parties are the leading makers of home pregnancy tests. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
The holding: (1) an exclusive licensee cannot force the university be joined as a plaintiff in the case (State Sovereign Immunity); (2) But, a lawsuit brought by the exclusive licensee can continue without the patent owner (balancing test of FRCP 19(b)). [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:50 am
Plaintiffs alleged that they understood these statements to mean Champion had a specific testing regimen and would not use certain ingredients, such as regrinds (filler that comes from already cooked dog and cat foods that failed nutritional testing); they complained of Champion’s failure to “consistently test its ingredients or finished [d]og [f]ood” for contamination. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:05 am
… Plaintiff also alleges that testing reveals representative Thinx products cannot absorb the amount advertised on Thinx’s packaging and website, but that each of the products leaks. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:38 am
The court came to the verdict to decline to announce a test for determining the plaintiff’s employment status, as a more complete record is needed for a proper exposition of the parties’ business relationship. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
In this matter, the issue appeared to center around whether the Plaintiff was a licensee or a trespasser.Finding that the Plaintiff had alleged sufficient facts to get beyond a demurrer, the court denied the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections in this regard.The court also denied the Preliminary Objections filed by the Defendant against the Plaintiff’s general allegations of reckless and willful conduct.Judge Nealon once again ruled, as he has done on numerous… [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
But this follow-up question tests you as to whether a witness’s allegedly prior inconsistent statement may be “proved up. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:02 am
Plaintiff's expert has testified that one of the physicians made "egregious errors" by failing to immediately order lab tests and radiology procedures that would have determined the severity and extent of the Plaintiff's infection. [read post]
