Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
Anyway, thanks so much, Richard, for letting us know! [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:09 am
To register with Own-it and gain access to our services, click here.Own-it is funded by the LDA [that's the London Development Agency] and the delivery partner is London College of Communication, part of the University of the Arts, London (UAL)". [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:14 am
The case is SA Palm Beach LLC et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
He ordered that suitable accommodation be found within 2 months (as in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham (2001) EWHC Admin 589) and for Harrow to pay Ms Coleman’s costs. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:00 am
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 479-85 (2005), this Court ruled that "economic development" is a public purpose justifying the use of eminent domain. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
The value of combo-SPCs makes post-grant amendment a useful tool for patentees. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 2:47 pm
Dale Maintenance Sys., Inc., 590 F.Supp. 1410, 1416-17 (N.D.Ill.1984) (allowing opposite sex attendant into washrooms while in use is intrusion on personal privacy warranting sex-based hiring policy); Backus v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
The use of implied terms or unjust enrichment to fill the gaps in the parties’ agreement split the Supreme Court and the courts below. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
Its importance, and the potential for litigants to use the principle for their own ends, were considered in a judgment on the costs arising from an interim application given by Tugendhat J on 2 December 2011 (Coward v Harraden [2011] EWHC 3092 (QB)). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:43 pm
We're very close now to the InterDigital v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The IPKat's email in-box has been bulging at the seams since he posted his pieces yesterday on the two big copyright cases of Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (here) and NLA v Meltwater (here). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince and McNatt v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:57 pm
Starting from my post on an unclear mention in Inside Housing, it quickly became clear via the comments that R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant has been a full-on JR application on grounds that Housing Associations (or L&Q at least) are public authorities exercising a public function as landlord, and that a policy of using Ground 8 is unlawful (Thanks to J). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Not sure you can get a map of equivalent changes v. each district court/court of appeals cases in the US. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
City of New London. [read post]
