Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1241 - 1260 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
  Omega filed suit after Costco imported Omega watches into the United States and sold 43 of them in California in 2004. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Igors NagaicevsCase number: 12-cv-0413 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: January 26, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: July 18, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-73 SEC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A state court can say, "We find that procedure X violates provision Y of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm by Phil Cave
CAAF has decided United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:44 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The decision purports to not expressly interpret Concepcion, stating, “[t]he conclusions we reach here avert any dependence . . . on two recent United States Supreme Court opinions, addressing the issue of class arbitrations for antitrust claims and consumer sales contracts. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court began to address some of the unanswered questions in People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that prohibited California from enforcing AB 51, which was signed into law in 2019 (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]