Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2007, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:41 am
United States, 128 S. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954)]. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
”Prelogar, arguing for the United States in support of Jackson Women’s Health, says, “The real-world effects of overruling Roe and Casey would be severe and swift. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:45 am
That’s because last year in Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm
Choice of precedent One of the chief curiosities of the decision is its choice of precedent. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
But the decision by states to elect their judges was a deliberate, conscious choice. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
State authority to define marriage is not being questioned in the other granted same-sex marriage case (United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
Here’s the press release: TradeComet.com LLC filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a complaint asserting Google violates antitrust laws by eliminating competition and choice. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
Ultimately, however, this should be Veronica’s choice. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"Addressing Petitioner argument that he was erroneously directed to repay the pension benefits mistakenly paid to him, the court said that the Comptroller "had no choice but to seek recoupment of such benefits, as the Comptroller has a duty to correct errors in order to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system", citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm
The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the case, and a unanimous Court agreed with the Sacketts that they were entitled to a hearing. [read post]
