Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 1241 - 1260 of 21,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like - the speech of end-users. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
 There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Geren (2008), which established the right of U.S. citizens to challenge their detention by the United States, even if they were held in a foreign war zone. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:20 am by Melissa Kucinski
Note that the Hague Conference’s Guide to Good Practice on Article 13(b) states, “[i]n line with the relevant laws and procedures and where it is deemed appropriate in evaluating assertions of grave risk, courts can seek additional information through Central Authorities in order to better understand the legal framework or child protection system in place in the State of habitual residence, or to clarify certain assertions of facts. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, imposes some constitutional constraints on asset forfeiture. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  All the while, of course, the national citizenry has basically remained asleep, acceding to Madison’s devout wish, in Federalist 40, that they “venerate” the United States Constitution and, in effect, never even think of having a second national convention. [read post]