Search for: "United States v. Hall" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy [2012] EWCA Civ 83 – Read judgment On 10th February 2012, the Court of Appeal upheld a Judge’s ruling that a Christian couple, Peter and Hazelmary Bull, had discriminated against Martin Hall and Steven Preddy on grounds of sexual orientation when they refused them a double-bedded room at their hotel near Penzance. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by National Indian Law Library
Hall (wolves, Endangered Species Act)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am by Rosalind English
The Soil Association formally objected to the plans because of the ‘increased disease risk and poor welfare conditions” of intensive units. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Dellinger, Partner, O'Melveny & Myers; former Acting Solicitor General of the United States (for Petitioner) Steven G. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Elizabeth A. Wilson
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
 In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
Reding's press conf. on EU #Dataprotection Reform package livestreamed today at 12pm GMT+1 here: ow.ly/8F0S6 #privacy #CPDP2012 # Watch Vivian Reding's Press Conference at the European Commission live here as I will try to live stream it at… http://t.co/whmihIQV # Megaupload takedown reminds us why website terms and conditions can be important http://t.co/LxaQfRc9 # V. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
This idea among others has extended from the grassroot levels to the Halls of Justice, with consequences ranging from the interesting to the appalling. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
This idea among others has extended from the grassroot levels to the Halls of Justice, with consequences ranging from the interesting to the appalling. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by abiinniss
This idea among others has extended from the grassroot levels to the Halls of Justice, with consequences ranging from the interesting to the appalling. [read post]