Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 6,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:44 pm
The Fifth Circuit released a 38-page opinion today regarding sentencing enhancements and terms of supervised release in a child pornography case, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
The minority rule then remains the minority rule today. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
FEDERAL CASES The United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the conflict between the Confrontation Clause and other rights and privileges are Crawford v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the first case, Mellouli v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
In US v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:02 am
As observers might have predicted from the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
Vejdeland and others v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
’” United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
’” United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:38 am
On July 16, in United States ex rel. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
