Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2008, 6:59 pm
Based on a government document filed in a federal court in South Carolina at the end of April in a separate case filed by Al-Marri, his attorneys contended Wednesday that his designation as an enemy was “illegal because it was for the illegitimate purpose of interrogation” — a violation of the Supreme Court’s 2004 ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
See, The United States Department of Justice Manual §9-105.000. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:40 am
His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [1] Lendenmann v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Justice White concurring and dissenting in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am
In fact if you look in the South Carolina Code of Laws which mandates what a solicitor’s job is we can’t be like a normal attorney is. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D North Carolina: System component used to practice claimed method is not an ‘unpatented article’ for purposes of false marking: Harrington v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
” South CarolinaRep. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, “asserted on Sunday that Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
South Carolina man is sentenced to death for the murder of a police officer, but seeks habeas relief on the ground—among others—that one of the jurors was so hearing-impaired that she was not competent to sit on the jury. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Denies Defaming Playboy Model Who Claims Trump Affair”. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
