Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:39 pm
Under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal judge may review his relevant conduct at sentencing. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has indicated its intent to sue four states – Arizona, Utah, South Dakota, and South Carolina – because each has adopted a constitutional provision that guarantees a secret ballot for establishment of a collective bargaining unit. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear the case to determine if an indigent defendant charged with civil contempt, as in Price v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In its table of cases cited, it lists the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
At approximately 3:44 p.m. that day the South Carolina Supreme Court issued its decision in Crossmann Communities v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:17 am
But in South Carolina, fewer than 3 percent can. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Vermont permit recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to interpretations of statutory language such as ‘pecuniary loss,’ ‘general loss,’ and ‘fair and just. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
Officially, Q2A performs its AdQIC duties out of its headquarters in Columbia, South Carolina. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:30 am
However, the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decisions. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Murphy (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court South Carolina – SEO/Web design consultant faces contributory trademark liability for ‘Copycat’ e-commerce site: Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am
Volungus, 595 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:42 pm
Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:31 am
Subsequent to that December 1999 lecture, the United States and South Carolina Supreme Courts placed limitations on these grandparent visitation statutes. [read post]
