Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 am by Walter Olson
If lawyers are really eager to have the facts of the Liebeck v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm by Hua Wang
  I was particularly interested in working for him because he, along with Thurgood Marshall, argued the Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
The Electoral College ensures that presidential campaigns are national and do not focus entirely on the needs of densely populated urban areas. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 10:01 pm
One of those bridges, the Roberto Clemente Bridge, leads to PNC Park, where Tamara Bigford, left below, joined me for the Pirates v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:30 am by Ezra Rosser
That, after all, is the story of how white parents reacted to Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:10 am by Ezra Rosser
In April of 2016, the Office of General Counsel for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued much anticipated guidance dealing directly with the racially disparate impact of barring those with criminal records from public and private housing. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
This culminated in the immense volume and intensity of reaction to the the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:34 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Civil Court jury sock John Hoff of The Adventures of Johnny Northside blog with a $60,000 judgment.In the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota case, Jerry Moore v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
Brennen: Race Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax Exempt 501(c)(3) Institutions After Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
For instance, in the 2005 US Supreme Court case of IBP Inc v Alvarez, the Court ruled that the time that employees spend walking to their production area after putting on required work gear is compensable. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court in Attorney-General of Saskatchewan v. [read post]