Search for: "VEGA v. THE STATE"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
You can read the underlying opinion here(though there may be problems with the hyperlink).Aaron Vega v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:47 am
An appropriate follow-up to last week’s post that discussed the pitfalls of the standard of review is United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:31 am
(State) (52399) [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:21 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:40 pm
[09/24] US v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
Sure enough, the docket in that case, Jones Day v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:36 pm
Relying extensively on Press Enterprise v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:12 am
” That, of course, is the same day the Supreme Court returns to work after its summer recess, some four months after its ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:52 pm
A split decision today from the Eleventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:55 am
If the state appeals to the Nevada Supreme Court, it'll be interesting to see whether the unprecedented $138 million emotional distress award holds up and, if so, whether any of the justices think that award is punishment enough so as to obviate the need for any punitive damages, or at least is sufficiently "substantial" within the meaning of State Farm v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
In Riback v. [read post]
