Search for: "W & W Holdings, LLC" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 8:53 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  The court concluded that “[w]here there is a conflict between the Massachusetts [Independent Contractor Law] and a regulatory scheme, the specific [FTC Franchise Rule] trumps the general [Independent Contractor Law]. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am by MOTP
We hold that the court of appeals erred by declining to reach Godoy’s argument, but we nonetheless agree with its ultimate disposition of the case. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Alabama, holding that sentencing minors to life without parole violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:16 am by John Steele
  Not if the lawyer worked on the project, said the California Supreme Court in Oasis West Realty, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:42 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
No. 390286/172468 (Panama); RUC # 1724681390286 (Panama) [SDNT] MARC LLC, 780 Le Jeune Road, Suite 516, Miami, FL 33126; 780 NW 42nd Avenue, Suite 516, Miami, FL 33126; 9100 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 912, Miami, FL 33156 [SDNT] MARIN GOMEZ, Mallerly Alejandra, c/o LEMOFAR LTDA., Bogota, Colombia; DOB 2 Jul 1982; Cedula No. 52719053 (Colombia); Passport 52719053 (Colombia) (individual) [SDNT] MLA INVESTMENTS INC., Virgin Islands, British; C.R. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
So simply as a legal proposition, any analogy between Sprietsma and Colacicco doesn't hold water.As a factual proposition, the analogy is even worse. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The amendment allows expansion of the San Diego Convention Center by the City of San Diego (City) and of the adjacent Hilton San Diego Bayfront hotel by One Park Boulevard, LLC (One Park). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
What with the seemingly disparate views of the First and Second Departments when it comes to marketability discounts for real estate holding companies, it would have been a great opportunity for the high court to settle the issue. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
” The trial court granted Wife’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, holding “Wife had no choice but to initiate legal action to force Husband’s compliance with the Permanent Order. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
 With today's holding, this Court intends to clarify the confusion and quell the consternation related to waiver under Rule 1925(b) and the number of issues raised. [read post]