Search for: "West v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 9,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
The West Coast Hotel Company. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  The trial judge in the 5th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:49 am by Brian Peterson
A teacher accused of embezzlement who accepted an offer to resign and repay the missing money voluntarily quit her job and was ineligible for unemployment, ruled the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in Webster County Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Steve Bainbridge
The amendment is designed to overturn VC Laster's recent decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm by Pennsylvania Employment Lawyer
 Covid-19 Pandemic Class Action Lawsuit Statistics - Wage and Hour Class Actions Most Common Covid Case of The Week - Wage and Hour Claims Added to Retaliation Claim - Aguayo v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm by NARF
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 (Required Joinder of Parties)) One application for a stay was denied on 10/25/23: West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm by Sme
Supreme Court, May 22, 2017) (vacating and remanding judgment in favor of Menon:  The Hague Service Convention does not prohimit service of process by mail, which is permissible if the receiving state has not objected to such service and it is authorized under otherwise-applicable law)*Blough v. [read post]