Search for: "8-31 Holdings,Inc." Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
            Did the trial judge err in failing to hold that the claim was time barred under s. 45(1)(g) of the Limitations Act? [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:02 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Popack was told by the Arbitral Tribunal that it had met with Rabbi Schwei on July 8, 2013 regarding the dispute. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
Now, in case you have never considered the job description for members of the Board of Trustees at a college or university… you can be sure there’s some fund raising involved… not let’s hold a raffle fund raising… I’m talking BIG TIME fundraising… the kind of fundraising one does by calling on alums who have made it to the top. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
Embassies in Beijing and Manila; Vice President of Motorola International, Inc.; and a consultant to The Carter Center’s China Village Elections Project. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Circuit largely disagreed with the district court about the statute, finding that the agency’s reading satisfied Chevron.[8] On one point, though, the court of appeals found that the Federal Reserve had inadequately explained its decision to limit its regulation.[9] Like Judge Leon, the appellate judges realized that eliminating the legal effect of the rule while the agency conducted further proceedings would harm the plaintiffs, who had prevailed on that… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:54 am by Danielle Parker
 In December 2020, the SEC filed an action against Ripple Labs Inc. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
They argue that the repatriation of the Benin Bronzes would symbolize the end of colonialism because holding on to those artifacts glorifies the violence of colonialism and racism associated with it.[24] Besides the argument of colonialism, the idea of cultural property is also very present. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
In a Dec. 31, 2020 brief, the Justice Department defended Vice President Pence against a suit filed by Rep. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
House of Raeford Farms Inc. and its plant manager, Gregory Steenblock, were both charged with 14 counts of violating the Clean Water Act. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]