Search for: "AC v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
Massachusetts: Several recent cases in Massachusetts are worth noting: Ace Precision, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Moreover, we know from Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust (1999) UKHL 26; (2000) 1 AC 406 that it is perfectly possible for a landlord to grant a tenancy that exceeds their own interest in the property, so it would not be necessary for WHC to have a lease of the property to be the landlord. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am by Ronald Podolny
Berryland Book, where it said: “The leading authority on intention and knowledge in this context is OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am by Barry Sookman
This duty, which equity will enforce with an injunction, was described in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 as follows: ” If a man has in his possession or control goods the dissemination of which, whether in the way of trade or, possibly, merely by way of gifts (see Upmann v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am by Adam Wagner
The approach to that balancing exercise was set out by the House of Lords in In re S (A Child)(Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:21 pm
Defendants then delivered a letter stating that the bearer was a certificated bailiff with powers to enter and seize goods. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by lsammis
Consider the ruling in a 1985 UK case, Lion Laboratories v Evans, [1984] 2 All ER 417, [1985] QB 526. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]