Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 1:06 pm
Rather, it is the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Keller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
The group presented Carnival's new CEO Arnold Donald with over 100,000 signatures demanding that the cruise line update its 35 year old wastewater treatment practices. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
In addition Birss J followed Arnold J’s approach in EMI v BSkyB when considering what elements should be taken into account to determine whether a certain website is targeted at a specific public, including the number of visitors. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
Given the uncertainties as to what the CJEU's ruling actually meant, Merpel decided to ask readers of this weblog what they thought Mr Justice Arnold should do, now that he has either an answer or no answer to his questions. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:14 am
The 13 May ruling of the UK Supreme Court in Starbucks (HK) and another v British Sky Broadcasting Group was well summarized by fellow Kat David Brophy. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:22 am
The jiplp weblog features a review by Mr Justice Arnold on the economics of copyright which concludes with an expression of regret that it was not available to the Court of Appeal when it adopted the incremental costs rule in Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1419 [on which see the AmeriKat's posts here and here]. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
The Wilson appellate distinguished the effect of Family Code section 3651 from the trial court's equitable jurisdiction to forever stay enforcement of the arrears, citing Jackson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:41 am
Even with a brainy judge, litigation is still a gamble.Antony was succeeded by Christopher Stothers (Arnold & Porter (UK) LLP), who addressed "Importation and Sale of Third Party Brands: Issues involving Grey Goods". [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
This issue seemed so straightforward till the Court of Justice of the European Union got its hands on it and now, following its ruling on smell-alike scent marks in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure [on which see Katpost here], while we know what we can't do, we're not so sure of what we can do. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Read more… Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
The Debate will be chaired by Sir Richard Arnold. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
The term was used with apology to Mr Justice Birss himself, but without apology to Mr Justice Arnold, who was sitting right there in the room. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:24 am
Further, as Arnold J set out in EMI Records v British Sky Broadcasting [2013] EWHC 379 (Ch) proportionality and fair balance with fundamental rights must also be taken into account.The claimants sought an injunction to restrain the defendant from infringing their copyright, but without defining their repertoire.Birss aligned this case with those cases brought by collecting societies such as PPL and PRS against defendants such as retailers and public house owners who do not have a… [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v European… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
Mr Hobbs QC considered the relevant authorities including the judgment of Arnold J in Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) at [130] to [138] and the EU General Court's decision in Copernicus Trademarks (Case T‑82/14) ECLI:EU:T:2016:396. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:37 am
., Herbko Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
