Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 2:28 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Baker, No. 11-6007/AR. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:51 pm
Baker, issued by the Supreme Court on June 25. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:01 am by Stewart Baker
Jim Dempsey and Michael Nelson take us through some of the possibilities: It was all about AI accelerationists v. decelerationists. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 11:41 pm by Stewart Baker
Sultan, meanwhile, draws the short straw and has to explain the mother of all metaphor bombs that exploded in the Supreme Court during oral argument in Google v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Yesterday at noon, with Dave Barshay of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC, sitting in his Jamaica, Queens offices, and I sitting in my Buffalo, New York offices, 127 time- and effort-vested members of the New York no-fault insurance and legal community participated in an open webinar discussion of the background, holding and impact of the New York Court of Appeals' then one-week-old decision in LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) Why is there so much bad privacy law, and so many privacy victims? [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
He also cited the case of Baker v Baker [1993] EWCA Civ 17 in support of this argument where it was held that the remarks by Scarman LJ should not be interpreted to suggest that the court necessarily had to place the minimum value on the disappointed interest. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm by Marketing
Author: David Baker Earlier this month, a jury in San Diego federal court was asked to decide if the use of the trademark “COMIC CON” by Daniel Farr, Bryan Brandenburg, and Dan Farr Productions for a comic book convention held in Salt Lake City constituted an infringement of the trademark “COMIC-CON” (note the distinguishing hyphen) owned by San Diego Comic Convention. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:05 pm
March 26, 2009) (Judge Baker writing for the majority to reverse a finding of guilty and the sentence on Crawford v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:19 am by SHG
” The ACLU is arguing that Bostic’s sentence violates Graham v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 5:22 am
Maybe yes, maybe no.If Riegel gets dismissed, then next in line (we thank Rick Samp over at WLF, who commented to the original version of this post, for this information) would be Baker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:22 pm
In this week’s episode, our guest is Rebecca Richards, NSA’s director of privacy and civil liberties. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting); United States v. [read post]