Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 Um, last year alone we took about 200 enforcement actions, uh, in plants in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm by Embassy Law
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm by The Complex Litigator
Sevidal sued Target after he purchased through Target's website some clothing items misidentified as made in the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:55 pm by emp
As one might expect with tax statutes, there are lots of defined terms so when we say “American” we really mean a “specified United States person”. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am by Gary Nitzkin
He seeks to make it easier to remove foreclosure defense actions from state to federal court, ending state court limited jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Susan Brenner
In the United States, the venue is either a county (for cases in state court) or a district or division (for cases in federal court). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Jacksonville Paper Co., 317 U.S. at 568, 63 S.Ct. at 335 (involving wholesale distributor of paper products made outside the state but transported only to customers within the state); see also Baez, 938 F.2d at 181-82 (involving armored trucks delivering to Florida banks checks and other instruments bound for banks outside Florida); Galbreath v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:10 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
The case arose upon a certified question from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm by BLOG
People's United Bank d/b/a Ocean Bank, filed in state court in Maine, tees up this very question for resolution.Patco alleges that it has been a customer of Ocean Bank. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
NAB’s registration statement in the United States, for example, pertained to “ordinary shares” (At page 58 of the Supplemental Joint Appendix in Morrison v. [read post]