Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 7,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2007, 5:29 am
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 7:32 pm
Kristen Patty and Kurt Kerns won in State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
Cooper, Case No. 138653. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:29 pm
But even enacted into law, opponents would object that this mandate violates the rule of Printz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:39 am
Inability to obtain a timely waiver to reemploy a person receiving a retirement allowance from a public retirement system of this State does not result in a breach of contract LaSalle v Board of Educ. of Bridgehampton Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 02632, Appellate Division, Second Department Edward J. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 1:34 pm
He also noted that the UPC has jurisdiction on the infringement of a European patent if one defendant of a multitude of defendants (e.g. a group of companies) has its seat in a UPC state and the claims are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together in order to avoid irreconcilable judgments (referring to Roche v Primus (C539/03) and Solvay v Honeywell (C-616/10). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:12 pm
Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
At CATO@Liberty, Julian Sanchez responds to Orin Kerr’s preview of United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
The decision in Latif v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)(striking down requirement of loyalty oath in order to obtain tax benefits)Cooper v. [read post]