Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 2:30 pm
This year’s case file, Karlson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:01 am
Fenves over University of Texas policies] Tags: colleges and universities, diversity oaths, Joe Biden, law schools, North Carolina, Title IX [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:01 pm
The case is Ford v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 10:53 am
Stripping representation from Texas, California and Florida does not punish them based on political affiliation (at least based on 2020 general election results). [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
" [Serafin v Serafin, 401 Mich 629, 635-636; 258 NW2d 461 (1977), quoting the Texas Court of Civil Appeals in Davis v Davis, 507 SW2d 841, 847 (Tex Civ App, 1974).] [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:53 am
FBI v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
But its federal lawsuit was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Northern District of Texas (i.e., Dallas), and in September it was dismissed. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
’”)); Texas World Service Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 2:02 pm
LEXIS 86519 (SD CA, Aug. 23, 2010), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim based merely on allegations that an unnamed Deputy Sheriff took a "religious cross artifact" from him.In Odneal v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
TSI is incorporated under the laws of California, and is a Washington licensed debt collection agency. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
Same result as for Missouri/California. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am
But then there are cases like Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Hageseth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Dec . 4, 2012)), California (Morvant v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
As my fellow amicus Mike Dorf explains, it appears likely the Supreme Court will rule for California and the House of Representatives in California v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 am
The Ninth Circuit concluded it does not, disagreeing with the California and Texas Supreme Courts, which have held that Nollan/Dolan is applicable to all exactions, not just demands for land. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am
University of Texas at Austin, the challenge to the university’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Lorenzo, Francis V. [read post]
