Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 3:17 pm
California, the Solicitor General, and Texas will get argument time. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
(Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Dkt No 14-981, cert granted June 29, 2015). [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am
LEXIS 25030 (SD TX, Feb. 27, 2014), a Texas federal magistrate judge rejected Native American inmates' challenges to the ban on inmates smoking the ceremonial pipe, infrequent Native American religious services, the grooming policy and the ban on medicine bags outside of cells.In Hodges v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:40 pm
In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v Nassar, the Court will determine whether a plaintiff is required to prove but-for causation or only prove that the employer had a mixed motive for an employment action. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:53 am
The case known as Garland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
Texas. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:31 pm
The case, Connick v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Legalnewsline.com reports that the suit, The People of California v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Franklin, The University of Texas School of LawMelissa E. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:15 am
City of Philadelphia, California v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 8:26 am
QR Spex, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am
Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
Texas. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:02 pm
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
California, 589 U. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
MishkinIt looks like the court is finally set to rule on the CFPB’s motion to dismiss in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Circuit, in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:35 pm
"] From today's Ninth Circuit opinion in X Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:34 am
The case, Carbyne Biometrics, LLC v. [read post]