Search for: "Call v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 55,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 2:50 am by Walter Olson
Last Wednesday I had the pleasure of appearing at the Intelligence Squared debate series before a New York audience on the topic: “Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 10:10 am by Jason Mazzone
Alternatively, if two-thirds of the state legislatures ask for it, Congress must call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
  In District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
In its recent judgment in Mulla v State of UP, the Supreme Court has continued with the trend of emphasising the extremely limited scope of the rarest of rare doctrine first formulated in Bachan Singh.This blog has noted Justice Sinha's contribution to the death penalty debate, where he repeatedly emphasised the fundamental precondition in Bachan Singh---that rarest of rare case will be one where 'the alternative option [of life imprisonment] is unquestionably… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm by Adrian Vermeule
Justice Elena Kagan, in an event at Stanford, called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
The Circuit Court decided that "the state-law claims should be dismissed so that state courts can, if so called upon, decide for themselves whatever questions of state law this case may present" and "we do not think that those courts should be bound, or think themselves bound, by principles of collateral estoppel or otherwise, to any findings or conclusions reached by the district court in its discussion of whether, as a matter of law, Giordano was… [read post]