Search for: "Change v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 50,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 5:20 am
In the wake of the SCOTUS ruling in June striking down same-sex marriage bans and granting federal benefits to same-sex married couples, many couples are finding their way to court houses across the country.Most states that have what could be called "gay-friendly" legislatures, something that we would expect changes over time, have already passed laws specifically granting gay couples the right to marry in a dozen states. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:30 pm
MARCH Ramos v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:12 am
In Jiminez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
The judgment in Agyarko and Ikuga is the last in a trio of cases heard last year which addressed ECHR, art 8 and the July 2012 changes to the Immigration Rules. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:23 pm
S. 602, the "Clearing Unnecessary Regulatory Burdens Act" (the "CURB Act), introduced by Senator Collins, would introduce an interesting and potentially far-reaching change in the federal administrative state. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Bank v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 am
HB 95, in my opinion, more clearly states the intent of the legislature, although the definition of “actual cost” in SB 31 would be helpful in preparing and arguing future motions should this become law. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
Yesterday’s program at the Rhodes Conference on military jurisdiction saw more debate on the wisdom and practicality of civilian v. military jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:54 am
The Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
Whether, under SEC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:00 pm
In Stark Trading v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
And through that ruling in Gideon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:24 pm
(Whether it did or not is the question the Supreme Court will take up next week in Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
The case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
