Search for: "Charles v. United States Government"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IAM)DSS case: Europe’s patent demise: (IPEG),EU calls on US to fulfill TRIPS obligations re copyright: (The IP Factor),How to safeguard unprotected know-how in FP7 projects: (IPR Helpdesk),European Council calls for a free movement of knowledge: (IPR-Helpdesk),Madrid amendments for double-treatied Union members: (IPKat),Proposed Europe-wide rules governing biometric passports are still unsatisfactory despite some concessions, according to European Data Protection Supervisor:… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 2:17 am
Ferguson or United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
.), as well as through the more recent medium of internet distribution, access to the inner-workings of our government, on both the state and federal levels, is at an all-time high. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
HARRIS, CHARLES M., Associate Senior Judge. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The patient, Charles R. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS
[read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant Charles D. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
Rev. 1, 4 (2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Sand & Gravel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Sand & Gravel v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
Charles W. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
That section is inapplicable here because there is not a United States citizen on each side of the dispute. [read post]
