Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2023, 7:47 am
In Ciminelli v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm
Sir John Thomas stated that, following A-G v MGN [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin), the test is whether “publication would have given rise to a seriously arguable ground of appeal if the trial had been allowed to continue and proceeded to conviction”. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
When responding to Jonathan Kowal in the Newsweek exchange, Super argued that state laws will let 29 Republican-dominated state governments hand-pick MAGA convention delegates to force through extreme amendments on a one-vote-per-state basis. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:59 pm
Rather than legal analysis, empirical sociolegal research tends to dominate the scholarly literature on these bottom-up initiatives. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm
Filed in 1974, US v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Court of Appeals decision (Storch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
In today’s case (Luvera v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
This view assumes that Bingham and the other Republican members of the Thirty-Ninth Congress embraced Justice Bushrod Washington's opinion in Corfield v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
There is an important strain of common good constitutionalism in the United States, even if that strain was not always exclusive or dominant. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:46 am
Follow-up: Ars Technica: Seattle utility wants $17,500 refund after failure to scrub negative search results. * State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
That false, pervasive opinion has dominated the national scene for far too long.The only thing Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet the Court found one in Printz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:48 am
KGAA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
The Court began by noting that, in order to assess whether the distinctive character of the Mark had been altered, it needed to carry out an assessment of the distinctive and dominant character of the added elements, based of the intrinsic qualities of each of those elements, as well as of the relative position of the various elements within the arrangement of the mark (Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles), T‑78/19).It found, in… [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 3:06 am
Stoltenberg believed the council’s state of affairs (a “shitfight”) needed a “bloke” to fix it up. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 8:55 pm
The Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
With a special focus on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
