Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
In Love v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am
., or entity incorporated under the laws of any part of the U.K. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
From Justice Barrett's unanimous opinion this morning in Lindke v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:35 pm
And if Michigan does, I suspect other states do, as well. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
A final approach may entail handing back more regulatory power to the states and localities, creating a natural experiment of the type described by Justice Louis Brandeis in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
District Judge Dalzell was right when, in ACLU v Reno, he said:“As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, the internet deserves the highest protection from governmental intrusion. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
District Judge Dalzell was right when, in ACLU v Reno, he said:“As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, the internet deserves the highest protection from governmental intrusion. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU’s) decision in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
They do not share the cultural and structural characteristics of highly integrated and self-referential codes of law that mark the essential characteristic of civil law systems—systems grounded essentially on the primacy if statutes and the rejection of law declared and administered by governmental institutions other than the legislature. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
This section does not limit employment by a professional corporation designated in this section to only those licensed professionals listed under each subdivision. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
It's purpose is to protect the public from abusive governmental demands for information. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:59 pm
Times v. [read post]
