Search for: "Doe v. Queen"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
Like the White Queen, he is comfortable in the belief in impossible things. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:29 am
This is the 25th anniversary season of the 1986 Mets v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:47 am
Now, you are probably wondering: “How does this work? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Understanding the law Does free access to law or, even better, free access to good law data, make the law accessible? [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
A Queens Family Lawyer said that plaintiffs Deborah (Debbie) and Sean M. are siblings, born on December 29, 1976 and January 16, 1980, respectively. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
We felt safe because we were in Mi’kmaw territory, and Donald was protected by his treaty rights, affirmed and recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1985 in Simon v The Queen and section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
He listens intently and does not seem to be afflicted with any nervous condition which would make him leave the bench to take a stroll about the court or cause him to change his position in the chair every five minutes. [read post]
