Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 1261 - 1280 of 15,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Yuga Labs’ BAYC has attracted attention of celebrities like Seth Green and Jimmy Fallon, and the NFTs have received media coverage in publications like Rolling Stone.[1] Yuga Labs was also valued at $4 billion. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am by Jeanne Huang
However, this does not prevent them from applying the laws of Country Y to a property situated in Country Y. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Pierre identified the sole bases for her purported belief that her statement was true at the time she made it as: (1) having overheard an anonymous source state that two active judges and one retired judge were related by marriage; and (2) having been told by a member of the bar that four (out of 23) active judges attend the same church. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
DA Fani Willis has until Wednesday August 23 to file a written response to the motion if she so chooses. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:44 pm by Scott McKeown
But, what does the change to FRE 702 mean for declarant testimony at the PTAB? [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Legal needs surveys provide evidence on the prevalence of (mostly, civil) legal problems in societies and what the public does about them. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am by Bill Marler
And, why does the FDA consider Salmonella an adulterant in all foods and the USDA/FSIS does not? [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An action to recover damages for attorney deceit under Judiciary Law § 487 is subject to the six-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 213(1) (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 15). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Hansen , held that speech constituting fraud does is not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Rudy Tap
A California appellate court recently held that a homeowner’s policy’s 1-year “Suit Against Us” provision applied to a Plaintiff’s Unfair Competition Claim (UCL) suit instead of the UCL’s statutory four-year limitation period.1 This opinion is an important reminder to always review the policy and be mindful of the One-Year Limitation Provision found in California policies, even if the cause of action does not seek monetary damages. … [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:29 pm by Lyle Roberts
Going forward, the Second Circuit noted that “a searching price impact analysis must be conducted where (1) there is a considerable gap in front-end-back-end genericness . . ., (2) the corrective disclosure does not directly refer . . . to the alleged misstatement, and (3) the plaintiff claims . . . that a company’s generic risk-disclosure was misleading by omission. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
Chronological order of the various duties may vary.Step 1: Probate. [read post]