Search for: "Does 1-100 " Results 1261 - 1280 of 12,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 6:21 pm by FHH Law
 On July 23, 2013, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 13-100. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The amendment of claim 1, by reintroducing the passage deleted in examination, therefore was clearly occasioned by the ground of opposition of A 100(c), raised by the [opponent] and was – as such – not late filed. [5.8] However, the requests with this claim 1 also comprised a further independent claim (5, respectively 3) resulting from only the features of claim 9 of the patent as granted, which was dependent on claim 1, but without taking up the… [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 1:45 pm
From my read of today's oral argument transcript, it appears that Philip Morris is arguing that if its course of conduct injured 100 different Oregonians and if the maximum amount of punitive damages that Philip Morris could be required to pay as a result of that course of conduct was $100 million, then the most in punitive damages that any single plaintiff could receive was $1 million. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:48 pm
All the letter does is briefly review her immigration history - which as I said, sounds plausible - and refutes some of the media questions. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Following decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 [headnote II.1], such disclaimers are allowed even when not disclosed. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:57 am by Colby Pastre
Income tax after credits (the measure of “income taxes paid” above) does not account for the refundable portion of EITC. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
  Because GSK is a Delaware corporation, diversity does not exist in those cases unless plaintiffs were found misjoined. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” MacFarland’s reluctance to make legal claims stems, he said, from the fact that he does not “possess a 100% understanding of all laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:51 am by Venus_Admin
That means, even if the plaintiff was 99% at fault, they can recover damages for the 1% that the other party was to blame. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am by Nico Cordes
The limiting feature could not be maintained in the patent in view of Article 100(c) EPC, nor could it be removed from the claims without violating Article 123(3) EPC. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
It is a lengthy decision (almost 100 paragraphs) covering a wide range of vexing issues relating to the private copying exception, with the CJEU handing down eight rulings in response to the six lengthy questionsreferred to it [For an overview of the CJEU preliminary reference procedure, see previous Katpost here]. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the ground for opposition under A 100(a) does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm by Robert Reeves
Some of these experiences have left passengers with nightmares even after they safely reached shore. 1. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:00 am by Moderator
If the SOL phase has ended, it does not necessarily mean a lawsuit can’t or won’t be filed; it does, however, provide an easy path for dismissal of the suit. [read post]