Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 1261 - 1280 of 12,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Notice 21-29 In the recently issued Notice, FINRA now offers an important reminder that activities outsourced to third-party vendors are nonetheless the firms’ regulatory obligation. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:00 am
Our next “Immigration Q & A Forum” is scheduled for Friday, May 29, 2015! [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
To be considered as the Commission develops the first public draft of its main report, comments on this Subcommittee report must be received by July 1, 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:38 pm by Sara Cooperrider
The employer need only pay 1/2 this regular rate (as opposed to 1½ times the regular rate) multiplied by the hours worked over 40. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
On appeal, Nuckolls attacks his ten transfer convictions on two grounds: (1) the statute does not criminalize the transfer of images to a computer; and (2) even if it does, the State failed to prove where the transfer took place, or who made the transfer. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
For example, the ratio between France and US when it comes to damages is 1 to 29. [read post]
[28] IRC § 6012(b)(1); (b)(4); Iowa Code § 422.6(1); [29] Iowa Code Chapter 450 [30] Iowa Code § 633.65; § 633A.4107 [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
The jacket does not have any embellishments, but that does not change the well-made nature of the jacket based on other factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:15 am by Douglas London
The result will be less-reliable Russian national security institutions, regardless of what Putin does now. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
What the notion of ‘large amount’ does allow is solely for national courts to determine, based on the circumstances at issue and subject to fulfilling the other requirements under the notion of OCSSP, whether the ISSP at hand does in fact qualify as an OCSSP. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 1 Complaint An excerpt: This is an action to protect the sovereignty of the Pueblo of Isleta (“Pueblo”) from infringement by the National Labor Relations Board and its members (collectively the “Board”) in violation of federal law, specifically this Circuit’s clear rule that general federal laws do not apply to a tribal government’s exercise of sovereign authority absent express congressional authorization, and that the NLRA… [read post]