Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 8:20 am
(WCxKit) 1. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
I was pleased to see the new proposed Circular A-4 acknowledge right up front that the “[r]egulatory analysis [it] describe[s] does not supplant any analytic requirements . . . set out in the statutes that authorize or require agency action. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992), noting it was rational for the voters to have believed that Proposition 13 would give new homeowners full information about future tax liability at the time of purchase, whereas an existing homeowner was captive to the whims of the tax man, and didn't have that same choice: [A]lready saddled with his purchase, [the existing homeowner] does not have the option of deciding not to buy his home if taxes become prohibitively high. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Procedural History"1. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
[7] Id. at 39 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
Appeals Bd. (1974) 11 Cal. 3d 274 , 39 Cal. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
Act of Mar. 14, 1901, ch. 699, sec. 1, 1901 N.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
To ensure that the Trade-marks Office does not approve similar marks in the future, CIPO is seeking to clarify in the proposed Practice Notices just when professional designations and acronyms will be contrary to section 12(1)(b). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
G 1/12, Nr. 39 der Gründe, T 615/14, Nr. 1.7.1 der Gründe).9. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
In the present case this holds true for all the features, with the exception of the clips 39. [read post]
14 Jul 2006, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court then sent this case back to the Superior Court judge for a dischargeability determination.What does this mean? [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:10 pm
In that case, they can be convicted under the state’s refusal statute (N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
TIGTA also found that revenue officer staffing does not always align with locations where the greatest number of high-income cases are located. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:39 am
(B) URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS- The term `Uruguay Round Agreements' means any of the agreements approved by the Congress under section 101(a)(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3511(a)(1)). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
The unfairness of this law was demonstrated in a case where a teachers union won a recertification vote 39-1, but because 40 teachers didn’t vote, the union was decertified! [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 9:03 pm
The lower rate does not change Florida’s already enviable rank of 4th overall but does improve the state’s corporate tax component rank from 9th to 6th. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Under its analysis an established violation would instead sound in damages [39]. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
In this regard, the Advocate General argued that an additional forum in which such consumer claims could be brought could be created under national law (Opinion, [117]), a proposition that does not appear easily reconcilable with the clear wording of Art 16(1). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
§ 893.13(1)(a),(6)(a) (2000). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
