Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2007, 11:00 pm
The Owls attempt to rebound as 6 point underdogs next week in Waco against Baylor (0-1). [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 2:48 am
The Court does not however determine at this stage local competence – referring the issue to the court of first instance. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:00 pm
The reduction to $36 per hour became effective January 1, 2008. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:12 am
The IPKat does not seem to have commented on this at the time, which just shows how dull it is. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:46 am
The Notice does so by providing a new safe harbor that taxpayers may use to calculate the inputs for satisfying the Manufactured Products Requirement for solar, wind, and storage projects (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”). [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 am
We thus affirm the summary judgment of nonenablement as to claims 1, 9, and 10 of the '432 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the '243 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 9-12, and 16-18 of the '861 patent; and claims 1-5, 8-36, 41-44, 46-68, and 70-79 of the '444 patent because clear and convincing evidence establishes that a person of ordinary skill in the art did not and could not accomplish automatic computer determination of teeth finish positions… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
In addition, we were 7-1 in our predictions of the winners in the Division I-AA FCS playoffs, 2-2 in the Division II playoffs, and 7-1 in the Division III playoffs - where all predictions were made using the YPPSYS system. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Section 68.2(1) does not provide a collective infringement remedy.[8] The result was that the Supreme Court found that Access Copyright could not enforce its tariffs against non-licensees, such as York, and, further, since Access Copyright does not have an assignment of copyright from the copyright owners, Access Copyright could not sue York for any alleged infringement. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:29 am
See 41 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:18 pm
§§ 1291(a)(1), 1346(a)(2). [read post]
7 May 2013, 7:51 am
41, I note that Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
We hold that a party's failure to disclose its experts pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness does not divest a court of the discretion to consider an affirmation or affidavit submitted by that party's experts in the context of a timely motion for summary judgment. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Annab does not contend that her injuries were caused by a “condition” of tangible personal property. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 12:52 pm
¶41. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
However, the SEC does need to act before the late-night TV advertisements begin. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm
In addition, Article 1(1) of Federal Legislative Decree No. 41/2022 states that “The provisions of the present Legislative Decree shall apply to non-Muslim citizens of the UAE and to foreign non-Muslims residing in the UAE, unless they invoke the application of their own law in matters of marriage, divorce, succession, wills and establishment of filiation. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
” Exxon Corp., 533 S.W.2d at 847 (quoting 41 Tex. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 1:22 am
Clause 41 Restoration on pardon [200]. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
Code § 35-41-5-2). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
