Search for: "English v. English"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 9,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm
The court stated that, on the facts outlined above, the “basic elements of a good, strong harassment claim [in English law] are present“. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
Turner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
” Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Lyle covered the argument for this blog; I covered it in Plain English. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
In April of this year Mr Justice Floyd gave judgment in Football Dataco & others v Brittens Pools and others [2010] EWHC 841 (Ch). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
ShareAt the oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, the court in Capps v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, the court in Capps v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:11 am
The Supreme Court held that the helmets were not sculptures, meaning that the respondent Ainsworth did have a defence to an English copyright action, but that the US copyright claims were justiciable in English proceedings. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:56 am
King Henry V walloped the French in 1415 at Agincourt. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
Serverside Group Limited, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:07 am
This is entirely in conformity with the principles set out by the House of Lords in American Cyanamid v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Singh et. al. v Braich, 2023 ONSC 5053 [1] This motion is about an examination for discovery gone wrong. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:48 am
See Samaniego v. [read post]