Search for: "FLOYD JUSTICE"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 1:43 pm
” Arguing for the motion were Floyd Abrams, legendary First Amendment lawyer; and Nadine Strossen, professor of law at New York Law School (and former president of the ACLU). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses the testimony of two state legislators – Jamie Raskin and Floyd McKissick – at a hearing on a proposed amendment to overturn the Court’s recent campaign finance rulings, characterizing them as “clarions warning the nation about money in politics after Citizens United. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Metzgar (the two cases the Justices will consider tomorrow afternoon), and offer my own views for why the Supreme Court should deny certiorari—and why, in any event, each of the contractors’ asserted grounds for avoiding the merits are ultimately unavailing. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
(the son of the late civil rights leader Floyd McKissick, Sr.). [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
From Statement of Floyd Abrams Before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a Hearing Regarding S.J. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Floyd Abrams, a rightly celebrated First Amendment attorney, thus explains that “it is unpopular speech, distasteful speech, that most requires First Amendment protection, and on that score, no prior Supreme Court has been as protective as this. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
It's Shanks v Unilever Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 1647 (Pat), a Patents Court for England and Wales ruling of the indefatigable Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
The Judge in this case concluded that programming a computer to do something “is the equivalent of the physical modification of Floyd J’s example”. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
First, Floyd Norris’ business column in the New York Times today discusses a New York federal appeals court case, where the court seems poised to establish new rules on who can be convicted of insider trading. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:28 am
An IP-rich Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd, plus Sir Bernard Rix) dismissed the appeals of the two financial institutions in a judgment, delivered by Kitchin LJ, which contained no law at all -- no cases were discussed, no statutes lovingly construed -- but which turned on an issue that is becoming increasingly common in IP litigation these days: how do deal with parties who are dishonest witnesses. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
Eleonora is speaking on "EU Copyright: Recent Developments" on the afternoon of the same day, along with Lord Justice Floyd and Katfriend Alexander Tsoutsanis. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
Against all odds and human frailties, he made the justice system work. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
Floyd Abrams is a member of the Executive Committee and Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP’s litigation practice group. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
Should Apple prevail on "slide to unlock" in the U.S., this would support Samsung's position that Apple can win only on its home turf.All ten European judges who had to rule on the European slide-to-unlock patent concluded that Apple did not deserve a patent for this invention in light of, especially, the Neonode N1m I showed you further above:On August 24, 2011, Judge Brinkman of the Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (The Hague District Court) denied Apple a preliminary injunction with respect to "slide… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:03 pm
The family of Allen Ray Floyd had sued G.M. after Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
(Aside: Floyd Abrams filed an amicus brief in that case on behalf of the New York Times.) [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court was told that Mr Lilley had sought permission to appeal this order but was refused by a decision of Floyd LJ. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
(Aside: Floyd Abrams filed an amicus brief in that case on behalf of the New York Times.) [read post]
