Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 1261 - 1280 of 12,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 3:15 am
”Because it shared the view that the police frequently encounter “hazardous conditions,” and that incidents of this sort are considered “inherent risks of the work,” the AD3 confirmed the denial of relief in the officer's favor.That certainly was no accident.# # #DECISIONMatter of M. v Gardner [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
"That the ramp was intended for the transport of materials, and was not a substitute for a ladder or scaffold, was of “no moment,” as the operative consideration was whether “the ramp covered a significant elevation differential,” and since it did so here, the AD1 agreed that, absent the appropriate protections, liability attached.Looks like this case just got a bit more elevated …# # #DECISIONL. v Whitestar Consulting & Contr., Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
And, in any event, the employer's version of the facts wasn’t “material,” given its concession that no lifting devices (as required by law) had been supplied.The AD1 sure closed the door on that ….# # #DECISIONJFT v 1211 6th Ave. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 10:46 am by ADeStefano
In Cardenas v. 111-127 Cabrini Apartments Corp., the plaintiff was injured while painting when he fell from a ladder that had a defective supporting bracket that could become unlocked without warning. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
  The club argued that its activites fell within a permissible secondary use - "unpaved airstrip and heli pad". [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
NO DESIGN OR STRUCTURAL DEFECT EXISTEDJDP was injured when he fell down an exposed cellar staircase, after the doors were left open, at a property owned by 4221 Broadway Owner LLC, and leased by Tierra Y Mar Restaurant. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
’s case appears to have run out of gas.# # #B. v Accede Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:53 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in DHS v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
”In this instance, given that the postal worker contented that the USPS records contained pertinent data, and that there was other evidence which suggested that the owner had notice of the condition, the AD2 agreed that the timing of the owner’s motion was a bit early and left the outcome undisturbed.Guess the AD2 delivered some bad news there.# # #DECISIONK. v 21-43 27th St., LLC [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 10:46 am by ADeStefano
In Cardenas v. 111-127 Cabrini Apartments Corp., the plaintiff was injured while painting when he fell from a ladder that had a defective supporting bracket that could become unlocked without warning. [read post]