Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 1261 - 1280 of 17,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
Heffernan v Rent Service [2009] EWHC 3539 (Admin) Mr Heffernan has renewed his battle with Sheffield's rent officers with a new appearance before the High Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This new understanding could be particularly troubling in the field of state and local taxation. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:16 pm by David Wagner
This teleseminar will focus on a Pennsylvania Federal Court’s recent allowance of Aggregation Claims against an established and DEP Permitted gas field. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm by Simon Gibbs
The following comes from the Association of Law Costs Draftmen's council: This is the collective response of the council of the ALCD to the posts made in response to the article Costs Counsel v Costs Lawyer [click link]. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:02 am by Karen Gullo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in support of two plaintiffs in consolidated cases, Fields v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Victoria VanBuren
by Alan Scott Rau Some of the readers of this blog may have missed the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Cape Flattery Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
    In a post here last May, I talked about the California Supreme Court's decision in In Re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298, suggesting that in that decision, the Supremes might have enlarged the field of potential litigation under California's notorious UCL, and I also gave a little history of how the UCL grew out of control, became a playground for uninjured bounty-hunters and eventually ran into a voter buzz-saw in… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:51 pm
From the industrious and observant Birgit Clark comes news of an interesting decision from Germany in the field of personality/privacy rights v freedom of art. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
By Eric Goldman Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay, Inc., 2007 WL 4553999 (9th Cir. [read post]