Search for: "Folks v. Folks" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 4:21 pm
Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:37 am
  Now consider the contrast provided by the folks at Reason through these posts about President Obama's response in his town hall to inquiries about legalizing marijuana: Obama on Pot: Har Har Har, The Joke's On You! [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
[LINK] JOAO Control & Monitoring v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:15 am
We have become so use to talking about cases where an employer wins the discrimination claim but loses on retaliation that it is almost shocking to see the reverse. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:24 am by Travis Crabtree
The headline is catchy — only if you are following the issue close enough to know the name of the case is Boring v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:59 pm
This fact was driven home recently when New York's Second Department Appellate Division issued its ruling in Fasano v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:44 pm by Harold O'Grady
Earlier this month, a class-action complaint was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of We Shall Overcome Foundation v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:28 pm
Todd Smith of the Texas Appellate Law Blog has a thoughtful post today about last week’s Texas Supreme Court decision in Fairfield Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:08 pm
., a southerner who's now 56 years old.I'd be stunned if the folks at San Quentin can't figure out which one of them that is. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  It's a testament to where we are as a country that we nonetheless have serious fights about whether we should actually bother to count these votes, or instead look for an excuse -- and that's what it is, folks:  an excuse -- not to count them.Are there legitimate reasons why one should prefer that people vote in their designated precincts? [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
  It simply seems like it's rebutted in situations in which, as here, everyone agrees that the impropriety resulted in (1) an acquittal on an offense that lots of jurors thought the guy was guilty of, and (2) a conviction in which all the jurors already thought the guy was guilty (and a portion of whom were merely hoping to convict on a greater offense).The case that Justice Robie cites for prejudice in this context is People v. [read post]