Search for: "Garcia v. Garcia" Results 1261 - 1280 of 2,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2009, 3:01 am
For good measure, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:43 pm by Christopher Ernst
   About a month ago, the First District Court of Appeals in California directly addressed this question in Garcia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm by Rumpole
" We end our lesson with Judge Colodny and Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
 Never Too Late 67  [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems case |… [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994 (7th Cir.2007)(the Seventh Circuit, citing Knotts and Karo, held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle does not constitute a search or seizure.) [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 4:24 am
El Paso Energy Corp              Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville          ERISA:  Appeal of dismissal of breach of           fidcuary duty claim       07a0075p.06 2007/02/23 Garcia-Flores v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:02 am by José Guillermo
En este sentido, es indispensable que sea in limine o al momento de sentenciarse un conflicto de intereses intersubjetivos, vía acción de Amparo, que el Juzgador analice si se cumple en forma conjuntiva, a parte de los presupuestos generales, con los presupuestos específicos siguientes: Certidumbre del derecho que se busca proteger (que resulta crucial para el tema planteado). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
Zelon.Split in DistrictDespite conceding that Manchel's argument held such "considerable appeal" that another division in the district had recently accepted it in People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:32 am by Richard J. Webb
" Eschelman, associate general counsel of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, dismisses Garcia v. [read post]