Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 76,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
Given yesterday's case from Massachusetts, this is a major development in an area of law that matters a lot to law firm and clients. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
So the other particularly fascinating item – to me, anyway – that popped up in my twitter feed while I was on vacation was this important decision by the Ninth Circuit, Demer v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 pm
By Jason Rantanen Dey, L.P. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:22 pm
The court’s 4-0 decision (the newest justice, Gilbert V. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
We are discussing ATP Tour v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:02 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:13 pm
See Coker v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany: (Case C-204/09); [2012] WLR (D) 45 “The option given to member states pursuant to the first sentence of the second sub-paragraph of article 2(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2003/4/EC of not regarding ‘bodies or institutions acting in a … legislative capacity’ as ‘public authorities’ responsible for guaranteeing access to environmental information, could be… [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:40 pm
Indeed, given the issues involved, and the potential for damage, it was probably the best that the Court could have done. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:25 am
The Court of Appeal has given permission to appeal to each of the three defendants against the decision of Warby J in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)). [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Debating King v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
In Jewel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 6:15 pm
Case citation: Block v. eBay, Inc., No. 12-16527 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
This conclusion followed from accepting the evidence of Hospira's expert Dr Earhart given in Figure 1 (illustrated). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=Joo90ZWrUkU [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:00 am
In Gaden v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
The case of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland dealt with whether the advice given by the UK Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament (that is, discontinue its session) for a number of days between September and October 2019 was lawful. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:25 am
Member States are also required to ensure that, where this is not given, appropriate measures are put in place to protect the consumer. [read post]
